| Electronics Forum |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| treez |
Posted: August 29, 2012 06:22 am
|
|
Forum Addict ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Trusted Members Posts: 897 Member No.: 17,791 Joined: August 29, 2008 |
Hello,
I am trying to solve simulataneous equations to find Lm and Llkp in equation 8, page 4 of the following http://www.fairchildsemi.com/an/AN/AN-4151.pdf I have Lp = 800uH and Lr = 200uH , but i did the substitution, then the quadratic solver [x=-b+-(sqrt(b^2-4ac)/2a) and it doesnt work do you know why? |
| Sch3mat1c |
Posted: August 29, 2012 09:01 am
|
![]() Forum Addict ++ Group: Moderators Posts: 18,146 Member No.: 73 Joined: July 24, 2002 |
I think I've figured out that the author means "parallel" when writing "//". Not, like, double division or something.
Mathematics provides a "||" symbol to indicate parallelism, as it happens. Easy one, Lm = Lp - Likp (8a) Some work, Lr = Likp + (Lm || Likp) (8b ) = Likp + Lm * Likp / (Lm + Likp) = Likp * ( 1 + 1 / (1 + Likp / Lm) ) Substitute, Lr = Likp * ( 1 + 1 / (1 + Likp / (Lp - Likp)) ) = Likp * ( 1 + (Lp - Likp) / ((Lp - Likp) + Likp) ) = Likp * ( (Lp + (Lp - Likp)) / Lp ) = Likp * (2 Lp - Likp) / Lp 0 = Likp^2 * (-1 / Lp) + Likp * 2 + (-Lr) Likp = (-2 +/- sqrt( (2)^2 - 4 * (-1 / Lp) * (-Lr) ) ) / 2 Likp = -1 +/- sqrt(1 - Lr/Lp) Evidently 0 <= Lr/Lp < 1 for a reasonable solution. Finally, Lm = Lp - Likp = Lp + 1 -/+ sqrt(1 - Lr/Lp) I don't think this is right because I seem to have placed an extra inductance somewhere. Algebra in text is boring, do it on paper to be sure. Or just as Wolfram Alpha, it'll solve a system this small. Tim -------------------- Answering questions is a tricky subject to practice. Not due to the difficulty of formulating or locating answers, but due to the human inability of asking the right questions; a skill that, were one to possess, would put them in the "answering" category.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
:: support us ::